Thursday, April 3, 2025

LOST CHAPTERS (2024) NDNF 2025


Young woman returns from Spain to visit her father. Arriving home she finds he is searching for rare books that will help preserve Venezuelan history and that her grandmother's memory is fading. When she finds a postcard  stuck in a book, she sets off with her dad to find a previous unknown book.

If you have been going to New Directors New Films for any length of time you know that the festival frequently shows small films that, while good, are probably not going to get a huge release. It's not that that they are bad, rather that they are just so low key or atypical most distributors in the US wouldn't know what to do with them. Often, as in the case with LOST CHAPTERS, small also means short, in this case 67 minutes, which means most theaters won't play it. That means if you like small, atypical films, you are going to have to jump to NDNF in order to see it.

This is a low key film that isn't really about the plot. Told in longish static shots this is more about the relationships of the people and the ideas being discussed in their conversations. This is a film about family, about memory, about how we see the past and decide what to hold on to, and what we unexpectedly lose. It's a film where we follow some good people around for a while and see how they feel about the things in their lives. I know some people have compared it to a documentary  in its approach but that isn't quiet right, while some sequences feel that way, others are most decidedly written.

I like the film. Its a small gem of a film. It doesn't have bells and whistles, it just quietly entertains and makes you ponder life. That this film is probably going to disappear from view here in the US is a kind of a sad sign about the state of American cinamtic tastes. That said, if you want to see something good, mae an effort to go see LOST CHAPTERS before it disappears from  New Directors.

Wednesday, April 2, 2025

Yoko Kanno played New York City (finally) at Town Hall


This is not so much a review but a report of a fan getting to see one of his musical gods for the first time.

Yoko Kanno has finally played New York City. While Kanno had appeared at a 2023 concert celebrating the 25th anniversary of Cowboy Bebop to say than you,  this was the first time she was on stage and played her music. It was a moment that rocked the world as people from across not only America but the globe treked to 43rd street to bask in the glow of the great one..

The concert opened with Logan Richards and his and taking the stage. They blew threw eightpieces, adding people as they went. Nary a word was spoken as the band effortlessly moved from song to song, pausing only momentarily  to allow the packed house to express their approval.

I was with my friend Nora, a regular at jazz clubs at in Manhattan and she was  slipping compliments in between songs comparing Richards and his band to many of the great musicians playing today.


Things changed when Richards stood up and introduced Yoko Kanno explaining how the concert came together and how he was in awe of being given the opportunity to put a band together for Kanno. Kanno’s arrival on stage, in a bright red dress,  was met with thunderous applause and a standing ovation. Kanno  smiled and thanked the audience before introducing the entire jazz band (though not Little Kruta the strings ensemble) individually and saying something about each person. While she had worked with some of the people before, it wasn’t everyone and yet she knew who everyone was.

Kanno then introduced the next song Piano Black before she receded to the side of the stage to dance and conduct.  Until the post Tank sequence of songs Kanno was purely a dancing conductor. After that she played the played the piano on several songs.


The evening  was a magical experience. Somehow this was the first time that Kanno was performing in New York, a fact that left many people around me feeling shocked. One would have thought that she would have been invited to play sooner. Personally I was feeling bad that I had missed her until finding out I never did.

The choice of songs was quite good. Honestly I’m such a fan of Kanno’s that there are a lot of other songs I would have loved to have heard played live, but not being happy is quibbling. The mere ability to see Ms Kanno live and in person was enough.


What I loved about the performance was that the performance was not by the numbers. This was not a recreation of the recordings but a live performance. Almost every song had improvisations. Any live performances I had seen of Kanno and her band The Seatbelts seemed to be less jazzy. For example while I’ve seen and heard numerous versions of Tank played live, this was the first time where the band improved and really grooved on it. All the songs were not a note for note recreations but something living and breathing in the moment.  All of the material, including the  songs performed by both Steve Conte  and Scott Matthew, took the versions the fans know and love and made them something special, something bigger and better.


It was wickedly cool and left me and everyone else at Town Hall wanting more..

What I want Ms Kanno to return to New York and do more nights, not just with a jazz band, but a symphony orchestra that can really allow the full extent of her musical prowess.

It was a night that is destined to become legendary.


The Set List:
COSMOS Cowboy Bebop
Odd Ones Cowboy Bebop
Slipper Sleaze Cowboy Bebop
The Egg and You Cowboy Bebop
Cat Blues Cowboy Bebop
Clutch Cowboy Bebop
AUTUMN IN GANYMEDE Cowboy Bebop
CAR 24 Cowboy Bebop
PIANO BLACK Cowboy Bebop
Time to Know / Be waltz Cowboy Bebop
Is it real? Cowboy Bebop
lithium flower Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone
Complex
Could You Bite the Hand? Wolf’s Rain
CALL ME CALL ME Cowboy Bebop
Waltz in High Socks Cowboy Bebop
High Heel Runaway Darker Than Black
Go Dark Darker Than Black
RUSH Cowboy Bebop
TANK! Cowboy Bebop
Gotta knock a little harder Cowboy Bebop
ENCORE:
Paradiso Wolf’s Rain
Green Bird + Piano Bar I Cowboy Bebop
All the photos are courtesy  of Anthony Mulchay and Town Hall

In the Hands of Fate (2025) is ​ on streaming right now on Fawesome


I saw IN THE HANDS OF FATE earlier this year but because of circumstances I could not do a full on review.  I told director Samuel Fronsman to let me know when the film was going to be released and I would put something up.

The official synopsis of the film reads as follows:

In the Hands of Fate centers around Donovan Harlow (Adam Joseph Turner), the reluctant hitman recommended by street hustler Vic Giovanni (Keith Migra) to work for drug kingpin Rocco Scaletti (Steven Scionti). Rocco hires Donovan to kill a thug who’s been doing business behind his back. However, things spiral out of control when Ashe Winters (Sofia Bianchi), a witness to the hit who Donovan let live, later steals money that Vic took from Rocco. To make things more complicated, she seeks the help of an old friend Charlotte Woolfe (Megan Reneau), who has since joined a cult headed by the egomaniacal Jeramiah Smith (Joseph Legion Slade). Now, Donovan must hunt down the junkie girl he previously spared in a chaotic tale, where everyone’s life is in the hands of fate.

This is a super little film and Fronsman and his crew are to be commended. As I told him when he sent me the film, keep sending me the films you make because I want to see what comes next and even after that.

Before you dismiss this film or the piece consider that I liked the film enough that three months after I saw the film I am taking the time that I could be writing a review to write up a pointer.  If that doesn’t speak volumes about what I think of the film, I don’t know what does.

Recommended

You can stream IN THE HANDS OF FATE for free on Fawesome: https://fawesome.tv/movies/10666537/in-the-hands-of-fate

DROWNING DRY (aka Seses aka Sisters) (2024) NDNF 2025


When I saw that Laurynas Bareiša's follow up to the excellent PILGRIMS was at New Directors New Films I got excited. I was even more intrigued when I realized that it also had been short listed as Lithuanian entry for the Oscars.

The film is very hard to discuss.  The film is about two sisters and their families who go to a remote cabin and something happens. What happens at that 36 minute mark is not immediantly clear and the film spends the next hour bouncing through time and replaying some events as we see what happened after in fragmented form. How you react to the film is determined by the pieces that are thrown our way. Because the trip is required to get a fair reaction I can't tell you more regarding details.

I will say that with this second cinematic foray Bareiša has taken a step toward being recognized as a crafter of fine human dramas. The characters are compelling, the situations feel real. There is a sense that for the most part this is happening right before us.

I will also say that I'm not so certain that the fragmentary telling of the tale really works. I say that because the fragmentation implies something greater than what we get. I wish the film had played out chronologically and that what happens happened without the broken narrative. The strength of the directors earlier film was the fact that it played out like life with no grand revelation promised nor given. Here the shift from straight forward to chronological muddies the water needlessly.

That isn't to say it breaks the film. It doesn't. It just makes what would have been a near great film into a solidly good one and that is enought to recommend it when it plays New Directors New Films.

Tuesday, April 1, 2025

PÁRVULOS: CHILDREN OF THE APOCALYPSE (2024)


I want to just say "Don't read any reviews-Just buy a ticket and go see PARVULOS". I say that because the film changes and changes and changes and while you will know where a bit of this is going- you won't know it all and it will punch you in your face like a boxing glove filled with cement.

The plot, or as much as I am going to say, concerns three brothers after a plague has ravaged the world. Lots of people are dead and the brothers are living in the wilderness trying very hard not to have any contact with anyone.

That's all I will say about the plot....

...about everything else I will say that director Isaac Ezban's film is a wicked little gem. It's a film that is very much about family. It is a family drama disguised as a horror film. The horror stuff is merely the window dressing for a film about the love of three brothers. It's a film that soars because Ezban stays focused on the characters and lets us watch how they are forced to fight for each other as things happen. 

I know, I know many of you want to know how it is as a horror film. It's really good, but it's more a thriller than a straight on horror film. Yes, there are horror elements but as I said the film is more interested in other things.

Shot with a deliberate use of lens and muted color palate that beautifully put us in a time and place. It's a film where the images set the mood almost as much as the story. I wasn't sure about some of the way Izban used certain lens, but it grew on me, more so when I realized how off the images were making me feel- they were dragging me down the rabbit hole.

I'm sorry if this a bit rambling and disjointed but this is a film you need to see and not read about. The power of this film comes from taking the journey from first fframe to the last. It's a film where how the revelations are made affect how you feel. It's a film where you have to go with where it wants to take you because the film is not what you think it is. Nothing is as you suspect, and I don't want to give you any clues about what happens beyond what Ezban has allowed us to know.

Trust me on this, PARVULOS is a stunner... more to the point it's destined to be consider a classic.

Virgin of the Quarry Lake (2025) NDNF 2025


When another girl finds that the affections of the man, she is interested are being directed towards another she takes magical steps to try and stop the pair.

This moody and oppressive fantastical romance of sorts is going to send chills through your body. This is a creepy little film full of the dark side of humanity.

While there is much to love in the film, some may not be happy with the deliberate pacing. There are lots of times where we simply observe and other times where there aren’t conversations but speeches. This is very much an art house film.  If you are okay with that and get with the film’s vibe this film is going to leave you deeply bothered (I mean deeply bothered)

Recommended

Monday, March 31, 2025

Talking about THE FALLNG SKY with Co-Director Eryk Rocha and Shaman Davi Kopenawa

 


This interview is a long time in coming. The interview was done on a Sunday afternoon in November 2024 before the screening of FALLING SKY at Doc NYC.  The film was inspired by the book by activist Davi Kopenawa the film is a look at the Yanomami community in the Amazon as they prepare to celebrate the life of Davi’s father-in-law who had just passed away. The film blew me away with it’s you are there depiction of life in this small community.(my review is here.)

The interview was done in the waiting  area of the Village East Cinema in New York City. It was a 40 plus minute talk with the film’s co director Eryk Rocha and it’s subject Davi Kopenawa and it was translated by Juliana Sakae who was the film’s publicist. It was a very animated discussion of the film  and the genesis from Davi’s book becoming, over the course of some seven years, a feature documentary. It was one of the most satisfying interviews I was ever a part of. It was so intense that I intentionally held off doing the transcription of the interview for the recent release (The film opened in NYC at the beginning of the month and it opens this week in LA.)

What follows is a good portion of that talk. It is not the complete talk for two reasons, one technical and one not.  The technical issue was due to the fact that about half way into the talk the theater waiting area which had been empty and devoid of people when we started, filled with people going to and from screenings.  What was just our four voices became multiplied and some of the talk got lost in a wave of cross talk. I, nor the personwho did the original transcription, could bleed out all the voices and as a result we lost some of what was said. The non-technical issue was due to my having to edit out some material for one of two reasons, either the discussion was super specific to the film and would have made no sense to anyone who hasn’t seen the film, and the other reason was that it was essentially off topic.

I want to thank Eryk and Davi for taking the time to talk to me, and Juliana for doing the translating and putting this together. 



STEVE:How did you guys end up coming together to make the movie?

ERYK: We went for Davi and Bruce to say that we wanted to make the movie. They liked the idea, and from there we started to develop the script, the research, this dialogue with Davi, with the Hutukara Association, which is the producer of the movie. We started to talk, and that was the starting point.

We never had the intention of making an adaptation of the book, because it's an unadaptable book. The film is much more like an inspiration of the book, or a dialogue with some aspects of the book. It was the starting point. It took us seven years from the beginning of reading the book to the movie on the screen, when the movie premiered in May 2024.

STEVE:That was going to be one of my questions… Why did it take seven years?

ERYK: Because during those years that we talked a lot with Davi, and researched and wrote some versions of the script. During this time there was the imponderables, like the death of Davi's father-in-law. That was when Davi and his community, the Watoriki, organized the festival in honor of his father-in-law. Davi and the leaders of the Watoriki invited us to go to their house, and for us to make this film of this incredible festival. A festival that celebrates the life, the rituals of the Yanomami. It's the festival that structures the whole film.

The ritual is called Reahu. We structured the entire film around it.  Reahu is a ritual that honors great leaderships when they pass, but also it's a celebration of life at the same time.

So, during the party, we were simultaneously together with Davi, every day, talking to him, raising questions, and  in this conversation stories would come up  that, along with the party, permeate the film.

STEVE: I don't know how big a camera crew there was, but how was it, dealing with all these people coming into your village? I know it's a celebration of your father-in-law's life, but at the same time, having people there, trying to film a movie around that, I thin would be a bit hard.

DAVI: Well... We met among ourselves. I met the leaders first. They asked, what are they doing here? What are they going to do?

They're going to take pictures, and film. What are they bringing? So I went to explain to them. Our leadership authorized it. It's not like in the past, now we're being recognized.

They could come and film and they could also participate in the big party we were preparing. A big party to celebrate the birth of my father-in-law, who passed away. 

Everything was open for them. It was very important for us to show our dance, singing, joy, and the community, thanking the wealth of our forest, thanking the wealth of our land, as it was created.

STEVE: I’ve watched hundreds of documentaries, but this film touch me a lot because it feels like it really represents the people. There's no barrier,  usually there is an invisible barrier between filmmakers and indigenous people.

DAVI: That's good. Thank you. That's good because this film is really very demonstrative.

The Yanomami people are sacred, they never, they never thought that a person who takes a photo, a film, would think to show our images to people in cities. That's why we wanted to show our image to the people

It's not the people of the city, it's the people of the forest that have lived for many years, many, that have never been filmed to show. So it's the first time that we wanted to show to the people, to so we’d be recognized and respected.

ERYK : Can I add something to what Davi said?  Davi and the Yanomami who watched the film, felt represented. I think this is due to a relationship of trust built over time.

We talked a lot before, exchanged many ideas, brought Hutukara Yanomani Association to the project, also involved a group of filmmakers, communicators and Yanomami in the film team, people making cameras, sound, production. Davi, Gabriela and I exchanged many ideas with Davi in the sense of communication, to really create a trust, a respect. The film is the result of seven years of work.

I think that time is the co-author of all films. So I think that what he felt materializes a little this process too.

STEVE: Time is the co-author of the film?

ERYK: Yes, time is the co-author. I think its this process of time, of relationship, of exchange, of being a hybrid team. I think all this has to do with the trust that Davi and the Yanomami had with us.

Friendship. Because it's not just a film for us, it's a life relationship, it's a commitment, it's an alliance that is forever. It's not just a film. We are friends now, a friendship that exists, that is being built.

STEVE: You talk about time and it's an interesting thing. The film opens with seven or eight minutes of everybody just walking into the village. It's one of the best opening shots of a film I’ve ever seen. Honestly, I was a little hesitant the first time I saw the film. I felt it might be too long, but once I got into the film, and then upon seeing it again, I realized it's actually one of the most brilliant things you do because however long that first shot is, you go from I'm in a room in America, to I'm in the forest. And it's just like these people are coming to me and we're going to engage.

It's this thing where it's like “we're coming to you, we're going to engage with you” and then they do and you walk out of it and you feel wonderful. You've met all these friends that you never knew you had before.

It's this wonderful thing. 

ERYK: Curiously, it was the first shot we shot of the film which is the Yanomamis arriving from the hunt. They went hunting a few days ago.

They're coming from the hunt to prepare the party for the community. So it was the first shot we shot a few hours after we landed in iWatoriki and I think it's a shot it's a synthesis shot of the film. It's a sequence shot of nine minutes.

It's as if the whole film is in this shot. And what he noticed is exactly what we feel, that they come walking slowly, they sprout from the ground they come walking with the forest together and the shot ends with Davi's look his face, his look looking at the camera. I think that's the theme of this film, this meeting, this clash between worlds, this confrontation between two worlds.

It starts with a more discernible shot, let's say, more abstract, the beginning, and it ends with Davi's look very strong at the camera, looking at us, chasing us. And I think this shot has a very theatrical a theatricality, a ritual. It's like a stage, the forest has this theatrical stage character.

And it's the time, it's the question of time, of respecting and understanding this time.

STEVE:  I want to know how much, input Davi had in putting the film together. Also, I'm curious if the film is the film everything that he wanted. from the film as well?

DAVI: So, I wanted to show our magic, the magic of the community, the movement of the Reahu, the Reahu movement, of preparing, painting, taking food out of the pots, so, that's what I wanted. I wanted to do something historical,  show to other relatives, non-relatives, the people of the city, to get to know them. So, we say that our movement is no longer like this, like this, curled up.

 We're like this, surrounded by the city. The city is far away, but we're not surrounded.

We have Brazil, Venezuela, Colombia, so, what we want to do is show our different culture, our culture, our different language, to recognize, recognize, and protect our place, where it was filmed, and show to the people of the city that it was like this. In Watoriki, we're in our house.

Our house is the forest. Our house is the place. So, we're in Watoriki, in Brazil, and we're going to show our place where we live permanently.

I really wanted to show our image, the image of our community, the movement of Reahu since preparing the food, and then, you know, taking the food out of the earth.

I really wanted to show something historical, both for, they call in Brazil, relatives and non-relatives, it's like indigenous and non-indigenous people, and for the people of the city to know us, because our people are not isolated anymore, we are surrounded by cities, so we need to show our culture and our language in order to protect our own place. So, we are showing that to the people of the city, how he calls, and then we're showing our house, because we are Yanomami, we are Brazilians, and we're going to show where we are living, and he used the word permanently. 

ERYK: And then it was at the premiere of the Cannes Film Festival for us, the birth of the film, and it was present, it was truly very exciting. And now the film has just played, last week, at the Hutukara party, the 20th anniversary of the Hutukara Yanomami Association, there was an exhibition, and we are drawing now, we are planning a project for next year, to launch the circuit in several communities in Yanomami, in Huatorique, and in other communities as well, so that people can watch the film.

STEVE: That's the one thing I don't have a sense of from the film, is how big is Davi’s land?

DAVI: This film only focuses on one community, out of 350 communities inside the Yanomami land. It's a huge territory.

STEVE:That's how you get people to pay attention, is you show them one,  if you show one community, you're going to connect the people, instead of showing this huge community, because it makes it one-on-one, and that's what's wonderful about it.

ERYK: Yeah, that's it, it's a very... Although there are layers of information, of narrative, of information, which is important, but it's a film that bets much more on this experience of ours, on our relationship with this community, with Davi and the community, this immersion, this place where we've been for a while, and it reflects our experience we've had, this relationship of bringing, of how the energy of the party, the energy of the party of this people, of Yanomami, of this community, how this energy, this vitality, it roots the form and the language of the film.

I mean, we didn't arrive with a psychostatic, cinematographic project ready in our heads to execute, but we discovered the form, we had many intuitions, obviously, studies, intuitions, desires, inspirations, but we really discovered the form of the film from this daily relationship, this party, this intervibration with this community. From this, this energy was what inspired and rooted the form of the film..

STEVE:Just something that I wanted to say which isI think it's one of the reasons I love the film, is the film doesn't feel like a documentary. It feels like a narrative. And as a result, from my standpoint, for recommending it, I can tell people, see this movie, you're going somewhere, you're going to be told this great story about these great people.

Because I know some people don't like to watch a documentary. IThis is going to play like a drama. It plays out like you're watching Life in the Village, and it doesn't feel like I'm being told a documentary story. I'm being told a story. And I, which sounds kind of stupid, but the reality, but it's not.

It's sort of counterintuitive. It's being, people tend, a lot of people tend to connect to fiction, in some ways fictional characters, but with this, they're real people, but they feel like they're so well-rounded, I don't know how he did this, I don't know how he managed to get, everybody on screen feels like a fully formed character, which you don't get in documentaries. Somebody gets left out, and that's why it feels like a narrative.

It's that you're watching somebody who's, you're watching a movie where somebody wrote this out, and instead he's showing life, but it's being sketched out. Forgive me, I'm excited. I get excited about movies.

ERYK: Yeah, because the movie has a dramaturgy, it has a dramaturgical thought, and for the Yanomami there are no these catalogs between documentary and fiction that exist for us. The Yanomami the cosmology of the Yanomami, brings the dream as a fundamental question, from shamanism, from Yakuana, so this brings another perspective, right, which is not, so that's why the movie doesn't work with these categories, so, let's say, you can recognize this or that. As I said, we are very inspired by Davi's thoughts, by the fall of the sky.

THE FALLING SKY opens in LA on April 2 before opening in the rest of the country.

When Fall is Coming (2024) opens Friday at FIlm Forum


An older woman is kept separate from he grandson after an accidental incident with mushrooms. Becoming lost and untethered she drifts through life until she hires the son of a friend, just out of prison, to help her.

When you see this film leave your expectations at the door. What ever you think you know what the film is, it isn’t that. I’ve read several pieces on the film and while the details in them are correct none of them can fully explain what it is like to see this absolute gem of a film. In all seriousness this film is just a wonderful tale that is uniquely its own thing.

Actually what this film is is everything that American films are not. This film drifts in and out of story in ways that are never telegraphed or clearly worked out. It moves like life bringing together turns in unexpected ways.  People have interesting sides and secrets and none of them are big to do they just are.

Why do I love film festivals so much? Because I get to discover films like WHEN FALL… which broaden my ideas about what cinema  and storytelling are. Sure the film echoes a novel in construction but the truth is it does things that no novel could do. This is pure cinema in the most moving and human way.

I loved this film a great deal

Highly recommended

Sunday, March 30, 2025

New Directors New Films 2025 starts this week

 


New Directors New Films starts this week and cineastes in the NYC metro area are going crazy.

Filled with films from new and upcoming filmmakers the festival is a good place to see the work of people who may one day become the next big thing. The festival is also the place to see a lot of works that may not get a big release until the filmmaker makes a name for themselves. I’m not being snarky, but it’s true, a lot of films that play the fest either never get a regular US release or only get picked up after the director hits (I’m constantly reposting reviews of films from a couple of years before) so if you want to see a film- do not hesitate.

The films at NDNF tend to be more art house than mainstream. This is great is you want to see good films, but not if you are looking for the next big Hollywood thing because the festival doesn't really do Hollywood much.

Additionally because the films are all over the place in subject and in style it’s hard to say what the festival is any year in particular. The festival casts a wide net and is great for people who want their cinematic horizons widened. At the same time I can’t say it’s all good because every year the fest is hit or miss depending upon my persona reaction to the films.

This year my favorites of what I’ve seen are as follows. 

CycleMahesh is a recreation of a man biking home during the covid lockdown. Not much happens but it is an absolute delight.

Holy Electricity has two guys selling crosses and it's just great time with great people.

Kyuka Before Summer's End is an experimental first film about a boat trip that should not work but somehow delights on every level

Listen To The Voices is about a young man from France finding a home in the place his mother came from. It's lovely

Timestamp is a doc about kids going to school in Ukraine during the war. 

Virgin of the Quarry Lake is a deeply disturbing thriller about a fractured relationship.

As always if there is something that looks interesting go see it because you may not get a chance to see the film again. And because a lot of the screenings sell out I suggest you buy tickets for anything that interests you sooner than later.

For tickets and more information go here

Liz Whittemore on Psychotherapy: The Shallow Tale of a Writer Who Decided to Write about a Serial Killer (2024) theatrical release starting 4/2 and will be on digital VOD 4/11.


This piece originally ran at Liz's regular home REEL NEWS DAILY

A hapless writer gets pulled into a scheme involving his wife, his impending divorce, and a serial killer yearning to be the subject of his next book. Tolga Karaçelik‘s first English-language film, The Shallow Tale of a Writer Who Decided to Write about a Serial Killer, makes its debut for Tribeca 2024 audiences.

After Suzie asks Keane for a divorce, Kollmick poses as a marriage counselor to throw her off the scent of their agreement. Suzie becomes suspicious with the discovery of each book Kollmick suggests Keane study. Convinced she is the target of Keane’s strange new behavior, the three become entangled in a complicated plot for individual satisfaction.

Britt Lower plays Suzie, Keane’s fed-up wife. Suzie has a type A personality and a pristine appearance. Her fashionably buttoned-up look, whether donning silk pajamas or a salmon-colored suit, is perfection. Her morose delivery is flawless.

John Magaro nails the role of Keane. He swings from overly nonchalant to manic as the film progresses. A celebration of childish floundering, this performance is hysterical.

The SHALLOW TALE 2Steve Buscemi is a legend. In pretending to be Keane and Suzie’s marriage counselor, he brings his murder advice into the sessions, equally confusing and intriguing his faux clients. Buscemi’s calm and confident nature is captivating.

The cast’s chemistry is spectacular. Buscemi and Magaro have a fun banter, but the most surprising firecracker moments happen between him and Lower. The way they both lean into Suzie’s macabre aura is a hoot. Karaçelik’s dialogue is witty. The cinematography from Natalie Kingston is beautiful, utilizing noir lighting.

THE SHALLOW TALE is weird, but the good kind of weird. It’s simultaneously so strange and dark you find yourself smirking and scratching your head, needing to know where it goes next. The film boasts a knee-slapping climax akin to a high-stakes ping-pong match. THE SHALLOW TALE is a dark oddball comedy that celebrates leaning into our authentic selves and the essence of communication, no matter the fallout.

SLOPPY SUNDAY (2025)


Christoff LeBlanc absolutely blew me away with his short SLOPPY SUNDAY.  The film is the story of a young prostitute who is looking to get out from under her pimp rocked me.

Raw, violent and foul mouthed SLOPPY SUNDAY is a film that works as both a crime drama and a character study. LeBlanc isn’t moving pieces around a chessboard he is instead observing real people in real situations. While there is a tiny bit of short hand in some of the side characters, owing to the brevity of the film, the leads are spot on. Actually the whole cast is spot on and make this something special.

This film is a winner and an excellent introduction to a filmmaker who is going to rock the world when he gets to do a feature.

Highly recommended

Saturday, March 29, 2025

Conveyance (2025) Glasgow Film Festival


Conveyance is a neat little comedic horror film.

It’s the story of a couple who move into the perfect apartment which was offered at a ridiculously good rate…because its haunted.

While the tone at first is a bit uncertain, once the film gets going and it finds it’s footing this film and it’s mix of humor and horror delights. It’s a wickedly funny film about the people we choose to live with.

I smiled from ear to ear.

Recommended

Audrey (2024) Hits VOD April 1


When Ronnie's  daughter Audrey has an accident during a mother daughter fight and ends up in a coma, the family isn't all that sad. Indeed their lives begin to get better, even with Ronnie taking over her daughter's life.

Black as night comedy is completely off the rails. If you want good taste look elsewhere. If you want people to learn a lesson find another film. On the other hand if you want a film that will make you laugh, while you wonder if you should be laughing, this film is for you. If you want a film that will make you wonder if they are really going to go there, this film is for you. (Medea meets Black Swan? Oh yes)

This is a film that is very wrong, in a very right way. I had a blast watching it. While I'm not sure I will watch it again, I really don't like most of the people on screen, I had a blast the first time through.

Recommended.

Friday, March 28, 2025

Warden (2025)


WARDEN is a neat little film. A feature film from Marcus Alqueres who did the wonderful FLYING MAN a few years back, the film tells the story of a superhero/super human who calls himself Warden. A resident of  Brazil, he begins to manifest his powers as teenager and then begins to fashion himself into a superhero based on comic books.

Taking the form of a documentary the film explores what would happen if a super human appeared in the world and decided to follow the comics (for a while) and become a superhero. It posits the arc he takes from good kid to something else, while also charting the changing view that society has when viewing the “hero”.

If you are a comic book fan you’ve probably thought about these things. At the same time I don’t think we’ve really had anything that dealt with this sort of thing dramatically. Yes, we’ve had films where heroes exist but this is the first time where we have a story where the first one appears and then explores what that means. It’s an interesting discussion that is very grounded in reality.

I know that this may not play well or anyone wanting typical superheroics. This is not a Marvel or DC film, it is something different.  Actually it isn’t even like other film like Kickass or Super where we get regular people who do super things. This is firmly what do you we do when a superman shows up among us. (I’m guessing the lack of Marvel style mayhem is why people on IMDB have not rated it highly)

While I think the film tries to do too much and can be a bit too philosophical, I love that this film tries to do more than a typical hero film. I love that it aims to ponder what a real world hero would kick up. This  is a film that doesn’t take the easy way and forces us to engage with it.

Recommended.

Electric State (2025)


Set in an alternate world where Disney's audio animatronic displays lead to robots becoming a work force, obtaining free will and battling humanity for their freedom, a young woman chases after her brother who has gone into the no man's land where robots still live. Meanwhile the man who made the cyber devices that allowed mankind to win the war is secretly experimenting on children to ... who the hell cares?

Loosely based on an illustrated novel, words that are always damning in connection with Hollywood project, Electric State is a disaster. Leaning into the visuals the film creates a world that doesn't really make sense, in large part because it tries  to explain everything  to the point that none of it makes a lick of sense. (And please don't ask me to recount what doesn't work logically- just know none of it does.)

While I like many of the visuals , I really dislike that almost all the robots are cartoony or are mascots. That isn't something that probably would have happened in a real world. It makes it clear that this is only a movie made by people who don't understand the world.

It doesn't help that this is geared toward being a comedy. There is no suspense, just jokes and humor. There is no tension...and no laughs as all of the jokes crash and burn.

I would ask how this got greenlit and how the budget ballooned to over 350 million dollars but the Russo Brothers made four hit Marvel films before this so of course Netflix gave them cash. Never mind that their films outside of the four films were just okay and  box office losers.(Something Marvel has noticed and are now rethinking their hlming the next Avngers film)

Watching the film on the day it released I sat staring at my TV  slack jawed and broken. This film was everything that was wrong with Hollywood. It was a film that broke me to the point that I never wanted to watch another film again and for three days afterward I caught up on my writing just so I wouldn't stumble into a soulless cash grab like this again.

While there are bits in this that work, the vast majority is just a less than mediocre cash grab turd ball. I still hate that I stayed with it to the end hoping that it would pull it out in the end. I still want to burn Hollywood and the zombie execs who thought this was a good idea. I'm glad that a lot of great crafts people got pay checks out of this but other wise this film has no reason to exist.

Unless you want to go dead inside don't waste your time.

(If you want to see truly great film that covers a similar story line then watch MARS EXPRESS which is a French animated tale released in the US by G Kids)

The Woman in The Yard (2025) (Spoilers)


After an accident kills her husband, a woman and her kids find that a strange woman all in black is sitting in their yard.

This is a metaphor for grief, depression and the desire to commit suicide wrapped up in a the trappings of a short horror film  which was inflated to feature length.  It's a film that has some great visuals that get lost in script that not only doesn't give us any real details about anyone for over half the film, it then flip flops it's symbols in the final twenty minutes leaving us to scratch our heads. There is a great horror film a draft or two away from this film...its such a shame because this film could have been something.

The visuals are what shine in this film as it stands now. The woman and the shadows she casts are stunning. The effect crew should be commended for the work that they did. People will be talking about the images in the film for years. I think I said wow out loud a couple of times.

Unfortunately the film's script doesn't really work. While the film doesn't tell us much, we have to work things out on our own for the better part of an hour, when we finally do get a few fleeting details we kind of wish we knew more. We never get a sense of these people outside of their worrying about the woman in the yard. It would nice to know more about the parent child relationship other than mom has been different since the accident that killed her husband and left her with a broken leg. Yes this is the mother's story, but the kids don't have much to do. While the performances are good, the characters are one note...beyond what there should be for a single day. They shouldn't be. They are vital to the story and to th mother, even if this is pure metaphor there should be more characterization of the kids because ultimately the mothers mental state hinges on them and how she feels about them, how see sees them is key to everything. They shouln't be blank slates or one note as they are here. Their mom would see them as more even in the depths of depression.

While I could detail more than a couple of the plot turns that are head scratchers (why are door knobs suddenly falling off the doors?) the real problem here is the metaphoric nature of the tale. Yes this film is really the internal battle the mother has with grief and depression, so the question of how much of this is real is ultimately questionable, but at the same time there kind of needs to have an internal logic. That logic is missing as things kind of randomly happen at times. Even chalking them up to a fugue state bits don't hang together and seem to be there just to get a gasp from the audience.

Things go off completely the rails about an hour in when the shadows that had been  the main means of mayhem for the woman in black goes side ways first as she appears in the darkened room before the flashlight is turned on, and then when it is jetisoned completely for notions of a mirror world. What once was shadows becomes mirrors and we are left scratching our head. It might have worked if the daughters letters beyond the Rs were turned side ways... the the real problem with the film is the gotcha at the end doesn't work becaus the reveal that we are now in a mirror realm collapses because the shot before the final shot of the reversed signature is undone because the sign outside the house is not backwards.

I sat in the theater wondering if this was two films or two scripts mashed together. How could they not see that the shift metaphors didn't work?

This film should have kicked ass, I mean isolated momnts work, and in stead it left me feeling, as most films I've seen in 2025, like it's just okay and in a week I'll have no memory of this game try, despite the good bits.

There is enough here that its worth a look for the curious but honestly wait for streaming.

Thursday, March 27, 2025

Thank You Very Much (2023)


Alex Braverman's documentary look at Andy Kaufman came as a shock to me. Normally I find that films that probe the history and psyche of their subject delight me with all of these hidden truths and things I never knew before. This time out while I saw a kindred spirit in a broken performer who never got over his childhood trauma, I also realized that the thing I always suspected was that he was a one trick pony who just repeated himself.

First I should say that Braverman's doc is a great film. It truly reveals Kaufman as both a human being and a performer. Its a film full of great clips and greater insight. A work of cinema it is truly a stellar achievement. And as such it should be seen.

The problem is that the film reveals Kaufman to be a person I like a hell of a lot less then when I went in. The problem to me is that Kaufman's performances, I can't say comedy because it's closer to stand up philosophy than comedy, always seem to be of a type. Do something mean or cringy and then flip it. The result is laughter not really because it's funny or clever but because it's a release from being made uncomfortable. While I found the idea that Kaufman's constant poking us to make us consider what is or is not real forced us to think, his method wore thin rather quickly since it always followed the same pattern. You showed us X but what about other ways of getting there?

Watching Kaufman in interviews and off stage broke my heart. I didn't see a performer, but a guy who was severely broken. I could hear the pain in his voice and the desperate need to be loved. In the footage we see he was always on in away that made me nervous. He wasn't a clown, just a guy trying to get hug from strangers... but while it provoked a reaction I don't think it was ever satisfying, so he had to keep doing crazier things to remain connected. ( As much as I understand his feeling of being betrayed by Dick Ebersol and SNL I also understand the break - you can't push and not have push back)

Half way into the film I found I went from liking Kaufman to pitying him and realizing he was nowhere near as clever as people had lead me to believe. Truly Latka was the best thing he did.

 I have no idea what your take will be. For me it's a well made film about a sad little man I never need see again.

Viet and Nam (2024) opens March 28 at the IFC Center


 In 2001 two miners in Vietnam have a passionate love affair as one of them plots to leave the country for a better life somewhere else.

This is a jumbled art house film where every moment is dripping with meaning and artistic pretension. Nothing just is, everything means something. The arrangement all means something. This is a film that has a lot to say, like a director making his first film and who isn't certain he'll ever make another so he throws everything into it. Unfortunately little of it sticks together. There is the gay romance, the desire to leave the country, class struggle, the desire to find lost loved ones from the war, religion, and about 19 other things.Everything takes center stage for a moment and then is dropped. It's never clear what it all means because nothing ties together. 

The performances are all zombie like. The notion of everyone being dead inside makes the film hard to watch because the film has a single tone. There is no life, only dead people. The dead eyed performances make even the sex scenes dull. While there seems to be passion, the facial expressions undercut it.

It doesn't help that the film now and again shifts to the metaphorical, not because the film needs it but because the filmmakers want to oversell the moment. The final sequence for example looks lovely and is heartbreaking but it kind of is just out there unconnected to anything.

I never cared.

While very well made, the film is so messy narratively and thematically I can't believe it's getting so much festival love. I understand this is the director's personal tale and statement, but it's so personal it means nothing to anyone else. 

A bust.

PABRIK GULA (Sugar Mill) (2025)


A group of young men and women who work as seasonal workers, arrive at a sugar factory and quickly run into trouble when they discover that the factory isn't on this plane of existence.

This is an uneven horror film where the story is there, the cast sells the proceedings and the sound and music crew undercut all of the terror by working every minute of the film and clueing the audience something is going to happen before it does. Seriously the music cues hit five seconds before anything spooky happens. That the score and soundtrack wound the film is a real shame because the images of the demons and the damned souls are so good that their chilling quality would have  been enhanced by some silence. Too many times we are signaled that a demon is near by the muspic well before they pop out.
 
If you can get past the music, this is a pretty good horror film. Yes, it's a bit over long, but the demons and the set pieces really kick ass and make this a film you will want to see. The horror images are chilling and are worth the price of admission.

Worth a look.

Wednesday, March 26, 2025

JANIS IAN: BREAKING SILENCE (2024) Opens Friday


This is a look at singer song writer Janis Ian who began to get noticed when she was 13 and ended up changing how millions of people saw the world.

Produced for American Masters, this look at the life and career of Ian is awesome. This film is everything you could want to know about her and then some. Full of great music and great stories it's sure to please fans and non-fans alike.