Saturday, May 18, 2013

7th Commandment


Completely weird film noir about a con man who staggers from a car accident with amnesia. He becomes a successful preacher healing the sick, building hospitals and churches and being a good man of god. When the girl he was with in the car sees his picture in the paper she plans revenge for his leaving her to take the rap for the accident. Working with her boyfriend she takes steps to get money from him and ruin his life.

Full of sleaze and praises for Jesus, this twisted little tale is kind of a must see for anyone wanting a truly psychotronic film. So much weird stuff happens that I was watching the second half of the film with a kind of morbid curiosity that one gets at the scene of a grizzly accident. I kept wondering what the next twisted twist was going to be, outside of what might happen in the next couple of seconds I couldn’t guess where this was going to go. I really do mean it when I say I had no clue what truly whacked things were going to happen in the last 20 minutes. It’s one unbelievable thing after another…

…most unbelievable of all is the fact the film makes it work. It shouldn’t but it does. I’m guessing that it works because it’s all so far out there that by the time it gets really weird and the bodies start piling up you can’t help but go along. To be certain you’re laughing at what’s happening but you’re also riveted to the screen because you can’t get wait to see what happens next.

I have no idea if I like the film but god damn I’m in awe of it. Hell I played a couple of sections over a couple of times simply because I couldn’t believe what I was seeing and was certain I missed something. I hadn’t.

If you want to see a truly out their film noir give this film a shot. I’m sure it’s weird gyrations will hold your attention.

Out as part of Images/Something Weird’s Weird Noir collection (and boy is it ever)

Friday, May 17, 2013

Some blockbusters and some not so blockbusters


BFI Fiilm Library
A few weeks back after Tribeca I ran a bunch of short reviews of some big budget or highly promoted films that I had seen. In the interest of showing that we do watch more than the off the beaten path films I present a bunch more big studio capsules.

SIGHTSEERS- A socially awkward couple with personal issues leave her controlling over bearing mother and travel across England only to begin a murder spree along the way. Black as night comedy is fused with a British comedy of manner/errors to make what is being hailed by many as one of the best films of the year. I wouldn't go that far, I'd say it’s a very good film that did quite work click for me. For me things are a little too rigid and I never felt after a certain point that anything could happen, which was what I felt at the start. Definitely worth seeing but I suspect you’ll like it more than love it.

SIMON KILLER has a college kid getting away from it all in Paris after the breakup of a five year relationship. Falling into a relationship with a prostitute things are fine for a while until it all begins to spiral out of control. I had a ticket to this back in February at Film Comment Selects but ended up selling it because the previous movie was five intense hours- and looking back selling the ticket was the best thing that could happen. Deep slow moving pretentious thriller will either thrill you or bore you silly…I was bored silly. Watching this on IFC in Theaters I was scanning through chunks of it.

SCARY MOVIE 5- not as bad as you might think send up of recent horror films suffers in that after four previous entries the series has stopped being funny and it has become something you watch in order  to see where they are taking each movie referenced. Cable fodder

TYLER PERRY'S TEMPTATION is a painfully dull film. Far be it for me to pick on Perry, who I actually do like both as an actor and a director, but he really has to stop making 15 films and 37 TV series a year since the more he vomits out the duller his films become

DEAD MAN DOWN- Confused and confusing mob revenge film starring Colin Farrell and Noomi Rapace. I admire all of the intense acting and strong scenes, I just wish there was some sort of plot line to tie it all together. In a related matter it's becoming painfully clear that Ms Rapace is a very good actress but she has a limited range.

A HAUNTED HOUSE is a crappy comedy sending up the Paranormal Activity films.

IDENTITY THIEF is a weak TV sitcom on the big screen.You asking us to pay for this crap?

ESCAPE FROM PLANET EARTH- Okay juvenile animated film about aliens trying to escape from our planet and go home. Unremarkable but not bad.

CROODS-I can't believe that Chris Sanders directed this. The jokes are stupid, worse they are obvious and repeated to the point of annoyance. The characters are jerks...this is a good looking but badly written film that makes me understand why some films have been pulled away from him (Bolt aka Family Dog).

PAPERBOY- I missed this at last years New York Film Festival- thank god for small miracles. This is an awful film about trashy people you wouldn't want to .. on. Yea the performances are good but the rest of this film should flushed

GAMBIT Cohen Brothers written remake of a Michael Caine film concerns an art heist that goes side ways. The cast ( Colin Firth, Alan Rickman, Cameron Diaz and Stanley Tucci ) are great. Script is too affected and the direction too stiff.

Having at last seen it I can now say MAN WITH THE IRON FISTS disappointed. Looking like a film that is some kid's idea of a way cool martial arts film (mixed with a gangsta epic) it takes too much pleasure in the cool shots of the wire work and not enough in the story. Give the film a partial pass since it's clear that in cutting the film down to 100 (theatrical)or 110 (extended) minutes hurt the film (there are bits in the deleted scenes that are referenced in the finished film plus the rough cut ran allegedly over four hours).  It does have some great moments and a great performance by Russsel Crow, but it still is draft or two away from being something.

HAUNTING IN CONNECTICUT 2 GHOSTS OF GEORGIA well acted, competently made the film collapses almost from the get go by insisting on have scares and shocks from the first second. We never get any real chance to know anyone except when they are under stress. Things are always  at a fever pitch so there is no scares only shock jumps. We are never in the film, we are always outside it.

I got GREETINGS FROM TIM BUCKLEY on VOD and finished it. I say this because I saw the first half at Tribeca and walked out because it wasn't grabbing me and After 9 days in the dark I wanted to be in the sun. For those who don't know the film is the story of son Jeff Buckley trying to connect with his dad at a concert in Tim's honor. The short answer is the film has great performances and great music, with the the concert itself being a stunner, but the rest of the film feels unfocused and as if the filmmakers were just killing time until they could get to the music. Wait for cable or better by yet buy the soundtrack.

Zatoichi vs The Flying Guilotine (aka Blind Swordsman Revenge aka A Sword Renowned) (1974)


Strange rewriting of the Zatoichi tale has the blind man returning to China after being dragged off five years earlier by Japanese Pirates.  He is hunted by a man with a flying guillotine who wants revenge for some past misdeed. He is however willing to wait until Zatoichi gets revenges on a master swordsman who allegedly killed his brother leaving his sister in law and nephew without support. (Actually the brother committed suicide after losing. And in a weird twist of fate the swordsman is now acting as the protector of the sister in law and nephew.

No none of it makes any sense though some of it is better than you expect.

First and foremost is Lung Sing as Zatoichi. He's the spitting image of Shintaro Katsu to the point I really thought that this was a chop up job that used footage of the original to form a new story. If he isn't the man himself he's close enough that you really won't care because he manages to get it down enough so as to be enjoyable.

Some of the the fight scenes are quite good with the framing such as in the battle between Zatoichi's brother and the master swordsman being beautifully done.

The trouble in the film comes from several places, first, as I said at the top the film makes no sense. Its simply characters dancing around each other until 90 minutes have run and the survivors walk off into the sunset. More importantly why are some of the characters here, I mean the flying guillotine guy has no reason for being here since he's at the opening and the end and not in the middle.

Secondly some of the fights are down right bad with them sped up to Keystone Cops rates. Its awful and funny for all of the wrong reasons.

Thirdly this film is choppy as all hell. Even allowing that the only copies I've seen are pan and scan it looks like someone took a pair of sheers to the film and cut out about 15 minutes. It makes for one messy viewing experience.

If you can get into the film say 15 minutes in and you haven't pulled your hair out the film isn't all that bad...it isn't all that good, but there are some pretty good sequences worth seeing such as Zatoichi gambling, the battle in the casino, the final fights and a few others. This is not a great viewing experience, but it is an okay one. Certainly it would play better with friends and beers.

I wouldn't pick this up for more than a buck, but it is in a couple of multi-DVD multi-film sets in which case it's worth trying.

Thursday, May 16, 2013

State 194 (2013)


If you build the foundations of peace will it come? Promo material for State 194

Good looking film that seeks to examine the quest for peace between Israel and Palestine.  Focusing  on Palestinian Prime Minister Salam Fayyad and his work to create a state for Palestine by proving to the world that they not bad people the film takes a hard look at the chances for peace and how it maybe the small things that bring about change.

Its probably not a good thing to have the first thing you say about a political documentary, especially one as important as this one, is that it looks good but that was my over riding reaction to the film. the film is full of carefully composed images, great looking news footage and few shots that are much too polished for a film such as this (did we really need crane shots of cars traveling?) The film is one of the most artfully assembled films I've seen in 2013.

Getting away from the technical aspects and diving into the important stuff, the subject of Palestinian and Israeli peace the film is a good look at the difficult subject. It's a film that presents Fayyd as a tireless worker who bounces around the globe in an effort to gather support for his people and to keep the peace. As the above line infers Fayyad is building the foundations for the end or at least the great reduction of tension.

Film maker Dan Setton has made an important film that manages to go into detail about what the leaders are doing to bring about peace. Most films on the subject such as 5 Broken Cameras deal with the issues on the average Joe level, which is all fine and good but after the 12th look you kind of wonder who the leaders are and what they are doing. This film fills in that gap and does so nicely.

That may sound like small stuff but it's not . It's something the world needs to see since we have to see  what is being done at a higher level than the village one when the Israelis decide to build yet another settlement.

The trouble is that the film is so artfully assembled and slick that the film seems like a commercial more than an expose. I return to this point because to be perfectly honest the film is so slick that for a good fifteen or twenty minutes my attention was slipping off the screen. There was too much flash to start and it wasn't until the film settled down that I fully engaged with the film.

Worth seeing.

For additional information on this important subject please go here.
Palestinian Prime Minister Salam Fayyad

Brooklyn Film Festival Schedule is up and tickets are on sale

Here's the Press release-

BROOKLYN FILM FESTIVAL SCHEDULE ONLINE,TICKETS & PASSES ON SALE

Festival to Hold a Variety of Special Events Including 9th annual kidsfilmfeston June 1 and BFF Exchange & Brooklyn Meets Spainon June 8

BROOKLYN, NEW YORK, May 15, 2013 – Brooklyn Film Festival (BFF), which announced its film line-up last week for its 2013 festival themed MAGNETIC, has made available its film schedule online. The competitive event will run from May 31 through June 9 in Williamsburg at indieScreen (289 Kent Avenue) and for the first time at Windmill Studios NYC (287 Kent Avenue). Tickets can be purchased online at http://www.brooklynfilmfestival.org/tickets/ , and the schedule is online at: http://www.brooklynfilmfestival.org/films/2013/index.asp?cid=0&cnt=&order=show&kw=.

BFF is extremely proud to announce two returning special events at the 2013 festival: BFF Exchange and the 9th annual kidsfilmfest, as well as one new special event, Brooklyn Meets Spain, a partnership with Mecal, International Short Film and Animation Festival of Barcelona. With these events, BFF continues to expand its demographic outreach and further its commitment to bring to Brooklyn the best films the world has to offer.
On Saturday, June 1 from 1:00pm till 3:00pm at indieScreen, BFF will present the 9th annual kidsfilmfest, which aims to discover, expose and promote children's filmmakers while drawing worldwide attention to Brooklyn. The film program is tailored for children of all ages (films are rated "G"), and consists of numerous short animation, live-action and documentary films from Australia, Canada, India, United Kingdom and the United States. There will be a Q&A with the directors and actors as well as an interactive workshop following the screenings. Tickets are $12 for adults, and children 12 and under are free. For the full kidsfilmfest line-up, visit http://www.kidsfilmfest.org/films/2013/.

On June 8, the Festival will continue its BFF Exchange project, launched last year, free and open to the public, from 10:30 a.m. till 4:30 p.m., followed by a happy hour, staged at indieScreen. BFF Exchange is aimed at giving filmmakers access to the wealth of industry expertise that the city offers. BFF Exchange will feature a pitch session for local documentary filmmakers featuring reps from POV, Sundance and more, a BFF alumni distribution panel, a Short Film Distribution discussion led by Roberto Barrueco of Mecal, and a Microcinema in Brooklyn panel, featuring reRun, UnionDocs, indieScreen and Nitehawk. The Exchange will also feature a presentation by Kickstarter on how to use their platform to fund your film. For the BFF Exchange schedule, visit http://www.brooklynfilmfestival.org/exchange/

Also on June 8, as an immediate follow up to BFF Exchange at indieScreen and Windmill Studios NYC starting at 5:00 p.m, BFF is proud to partner with Mecal, International Short Film and Animation Festival of Barcelona, on Brooklyn Meets Spain, including two programs: the feature-length documentary 30 Años de Oscuridad directed by Manuel H. Martín, and a collection of animated shorts. A party with a special guest DJ Turmix from Spain will follow at indieScreen. The screenings and the party are sponsored by the Consulate General of Spain. To learn more about Mecal, visit: http://mecalbcn.org/. For the full film line-up of Brooklyn Meets Spain, visit: http://www.brooklynfilmfestival.org/events/mecal/.

About Brooklyn Film Festival (BFF):

The organizers of the Brooklyn Film Festival (BFF), have been staging international, competitive film events since 1998. BFF’s mission is to provide a public forum in Brooklyn in order to advance public interest in films and the independent production of films, to draw worldwide attention to Brooklyn as a center for cinema, to encourage the rights of all Brooklyn residents to access and experience the power of independent filmmaking, and to promote artistic excellence and the creative freedom of artists without censure. BFF, inc. is a not-for-profit organization.

For more info about Brooklyn Film Festival, visit http://www.brooklynfilmfestival.org/.

BFF on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/BrooklynFilmFestival

BFF on Twitter: https://twitter.com/brooklynfest

For info about indieScreen, visit www.indieScreen.com.

For info about Windmill Studios NYC, visit http://windmillstudiosnyc.com/.

Drunken Master 2 (1994) and how a few minor snips make a major difference

This piece was written back in December or January when Mr C and I were planning our Chinese New Year sequence of films. Now that Jackie Chan is coming to New York and this is going to play not only during one of  his appearances but during the retrospective, it makes clear why you'll want to see this in it's unedited glory in the series, and why you'll want to see all the films in the series where you can see them as they were intended  to be seen. 

Jackie Chan’s Drunken Master 2 is a case how a small snip and a change of audio track can radically alter a film.

I had loved this film ever since I saw back on import laser disc in the 1990’s. The film was supposed to be Chan’s martial arts swan song, but like several other films, the master just won’t stop.

The film follows Chan’s Wong Fei Hung as he takes on bad guys who who are dealing in stolen goods. In the film Chan’s a super martial artist, so long as he’s drunk off his ass. Chan ended up battling the director and taking over direction, which resulted in some of his best fight scenes. The film ends with a killer fight in a foundry where Chan is forced to drink industrial alcohol to fight. The film ends, in its original form, with a very un-politically correct gag as Chan is blinded and rendered moronic as a result of what he drank.

In watching the American version of the film I was horrified by how the film plays. It all seems wrong and the end punch line is cut out. Watching the film on cable I was sure the film had been cut up (after all Miramax/The Weinstein organization are notorious for chopping up and altering Asian films they pick up). The film looked and felt radically different than what I was used to from the laser disc.

In doing research for this piece I was shocked to learn that there are only two differences totaling less than three minutes between the full Hong Kong version and the American , first is the removal of the blind idiocy. The second is a redubbing of the film to “soften the violence”. I think that the redub does more than soften the violence it alters the whole feel of the film.

Seeing that there was no great difference I suddenly had doubts, and when I met with Hubert Villiga before a Leonard Cohen concert I mentioned that I was working on a piece about alter Jackie Chan films and he asked if I was going to mention Drunken Master 2. I said I planned to but I had found out that there are only two differences, the redub and the end snip. He asked me if I was still going to use it, because the two versions seem different. I said I wasn’t sure.

Not long after that, as I was debating what to do with the piece I mentioned what I was doing to friends at the day job who are big Jackie Chan fans, and they said I should talk about the butchering of Drunken Master 2 since it was clear to them that the two versions were radically different.

Apparently despite being essentially exactly the same, the American version plays so differently that some people, myself included, think there are radical changes.

To that end I suggest you track down a copy of the original version of the film either on line or in your local Chinatown and watch that instead since my unscientific survey indicates it’s a much better film.

Wednesday, May 15, 2013

Kirstin Lives in Los Angeles (2013) Is a damn funny web series

Andy Viner, the man behind the excellent Dick Night is back with an 5 part web series Kirstin Lives in Los Angeles starring Kirstin Eggers and it's damn funny.

The official synopsis says:
Kirstin Lives in Los Angeles is a five-part web series comedy about a woman hanging on to the dream of having a dream while getting caught up in the Los Angeles underworld of Kickstarter Con Artists, Twitter Prostitution and high-end furniture.
How much would you pay for a table

My synopsis  says the film follows Kirstin as she deals with her boss who won't pay her, her roommates/land lord who want the rent and how she turns to Kickstarter to get the rent and maybe a little more (it's not stealing it's Kickstarter). Of course just being on Kickstarter doesn't mean things will be a success...
Sometimes friends don't know everything

Structured like classic comedy shorts, with the exception that each episode leads into the next, each episode starts off heading in one direction and then takes a turn to some place else. Where each episode ends up isn't where I thought it would (thank you unpredictability. What threw me was that the first episode kind of feels like a stand alone episode, but it's not, who we meet there ends up important at the end. Each episode also ends on a genuine laugh which is something you don't see in any sort of series these days..
Pondering the cost of a tweet

Kirstin Eggers is great as Kirstin. I have no idea if any of this is based on her life, but she gives the character a lived in feel.  More importantly she also has  incredible comic timing that makes her reactions priceless (I mean how do you react to a naked man standing in some one's living room?)
Kirstin come in....

Andy Viner proves that what he did with DICK NIGHT wasn't a fluke. He's crafted a wickedly funny, ever building series that ends both at a perfect place and so to makes you wonder okay, now what happens? Give him extra points for perfectly timing out each episode to around five minutes. Nothing feels forced nor too short, its simply perfect. I'm officially an Andy Viner fan and I can't wait to see what he's coming up with next.

You need to see this. the series can be found here.
One word of warning, the series is not safe for work.
Success?

Hong Kong Godfather (1985)


Hong Kong Godfather is the source of much laughter for those who attended the New York Asian Film festival last year. The distributor of the film in the US gave the festival a good number of DVDs to use as give a ways. Actually it wasn’t a good number it was probably the entire pressing of the film with the result that at Subway Cinema events as late as December were filled  by groans as people in the New York City area who didn’t have the DVD were gifted with copies.

Strangely I never had a copy and only relatively recently picked up a copy in Chinatown. Sitting down one night when I just wanted to chill out I put the disc in and I quickly realized that the reason the film was being given a way enmass is that it’s far from a good film. The film is actually rather dull and boring, however it is enlivened by the occasional explosion of violence, most of which is in the final half of the film. It’s the fighting that is the reason I’m writing up the film.

The plot of the film has a rival gang trying to take over the territory of Uncle Han. When he’s killed by a traitor working for the gang three of Han’s friends plot revenge, especially when the daughter of one of them is taken hostage. What happens after that is series of blood soaked battles as the three friends wade into the bad guys with meat cleavers and knives and chop up everyone and everything in their path.

No the blood isn’t realistic but the fights are strangely visceral as it’s clear what the damage being inflicted by the people on both sides is. By the end of the climactic battle everyone is covered head to toe in the red stuff. It may not be real but it is disturbing. When the film ended I was chuckling about the silliness of the fighting, but at the same time I was disturbed by the implied nastiness…and ultimately the nihilistic attitude the film takes in the final half hour. No one and nothing is safe, and I do mean no one.

Is this a good film? Not really. As I said its all about the action, the rest is dull talking. If you can rent or borrow a copy and are an action fan, the film is worth seeing, but if you want more than that there are better ways to spend your time.

Tuesday, May 14, 2013

A very brief interview with Jeremiah Kipp on The Days God Slept and The Sadist


Right after I saw THE DAYS GOD SLEPT  (My review of the film can be found here) I started emailing back and forth with it's director Jeremiah Kipp about the film, the review and the possibility of an interview on the projects he's worked on (he is connected with some films I like).  I had wanted to try and do a big interview on DAYS but I didn't have a great many questions in large part because the film is best left unexplained. As Jeremiah says below he likes it when someone watching the film leans in and engages it. To ask too many questions would spoil that. I don't want to spoil anything especially when you haven't had a chance to see it.

Below are the handful of questions I came up with concerning the film- and two on the feature he just finished THE SADIST with Tom Savini which sounded intriguing. I'm hoping that this is just a teaser for a longer interview since based on my discussions with Mr Kipp there is much to talk about.

All photos are thanks to the courtesy of Mr Kipp and are his copyright.



Who came up with the idea for THE DAYS GOD SLEPT and how did it come together?

The script was written by New York playwright Joe Fiorillo, whose plays are often comical tales of men, women, struggling relationships and sexual tension, often set in a supernatural landscape. This particular story, while not autobiographical, was deeply personal for him. A kind of dark night of the soul, though he sometimes claims it's an exercise in form, or in experimental storytelling. He asked me to direct, and with the invaluable help of our producer Lauren Rayner we found the money through crowd sourcing. Once the funds were secured, we assembled our cast and crew, planned our shooting schedule and built a phantasmagoric strip club from scratch.


You said that you were thinking about a longer project in the same universe, can you say what you meant by that?

The collaboration was rewarding for all of us, so Joe caught the filmmaking bug. Since starting this process, he wrote another short genre film, one with a clearer narrative than THE DAYS GOD SLEPT, and we've been discussing a feature as well. The character names may change, but Joe seems to use the same Tarot deck when crafting his stories -- he's as possessed by writing about searching men and damaged women as Edgar Allan Poe was about the death of beauty, or of single-minded revenge.


The thing that intrigues me is how you got the timing of each stop in each world right. How much tinkering did you have to do to get the switches from club to park right so it had a maximum effect?

I remember drawing a map for myself of the various levels of reality in THE DAYS GOD SLEPT, where naturalistic realism is in the park and the realm of the fantastic is in the club, with these diseased flashbacks materializing along the way. Our color palette, lens choices and shooting technique was dictated by what world we were in at the time. So certain decisions were made in pre-production that guided us through post. That map remained handy when working with our editor Anthony Moran, invaluable post-production supervisor Patrick McGowan and sound designer Roman Chimienti. We always needed to understand where we were in the story, and if we knew the path we were on, the audience would at least feel the confidence of our storytelling.

THE DAYS GOD SLEPT is an experimental film open to various levels of interpretation, and my favorite audiences are the ones who take ownership of the film, sit forward in their seats, and participate in what they think this story means. But we weren't just making an abstraction. We had clear ideas of where we were, what the characters were doing, and that's important, particularly when working on something non-narrative. We watch a Samuel Beckett play and know he was writing something specific, even if we don't know what it was; we see the specific actions the characters take, though, and provide our own meaning. That's true in movies like Kubrick's 2001, Lynch's ERASERHEAD, Claire Denis's remarkable vampire film TROUBLE EVERY DAY...and while I don't compare myself to these great filmmakers, we're playing in the same arena.

Because the film is such a kick in the ass, do you have any worries about how it might play in a festival where it will be grouped with other films? When I saw it I was largely done at that point and it colored the two films I was scheduled to preview later that night.

The way it plays in a festival is entirely up to the programmers, and I can't anticipate the audience reaction. They may feel thunderstruck by the movie, or dismissive of it. When you finish a film, it no longer belongs to you. It belongs to them. That said, I understand what you mean. I remember my friend Doug Buck had a very dark, disturbing short film that often played before Larry Fessenden's indie film classic HABIT, and both films are such a night-shriek of despair that by the time Doug's film ended they had to careen into Larry's painful world. It must have been a harrowing night! Thankfully, Larry's film is superb and carried them through. I can only hope if THE DAYS GOD SLEPT gets programmed, that it has the right traveling companions, and that our films mutually benefit one another. For filmmakers, as cutthroat as the business seems to be sometimes, we're all in it together.

After those questions I asked about the next film he had in the chute, a film called THE SADIST which stars Tom Savini.  The first question I had was-



When is THE SADIST coming out?

I have no idea. THE SADIST is a work-for-hire movie I shot in Connecticut for two very young producers back in 2010, working with much of the cast and below-the-line crew I've used on other movies. After my frequent cinematographer/editor Dominick Sivilli and I handed in our rough assembly, which is the most vulnerable time for any movie, we were promptly removed from the project and the producers chose to finish the movie themselves, including editing, score, color correction. It was painful because I have a "final cut" clause in my contract that they chose to ignore. But who wants to get into a lawsuit over a low budget independent film? I can only hope they finish the film successfully and that audiences like it, though it burns me to think of what the sound designers and composer of THE DAYS GOD SLEPT could have done with filling out the world of that movie, and what Dom could have done with the color correct. We'll never know, alas. The producers screened the film in Connecticut this January and whenever a distributor or festival programmer approaches me about it, I pass on the info of the producers and keep my fingers crossed.

THE DAYS GOD SLEPT and other short films I've made since have been an entirely different situation, based on professional respect and trust, where we were all making the same movie. It seems now like I've been enlisted to direct my second feature, once again with people I know and have worked with before to satisfying results. I'm ready to climb the higher mountains of feature filmmaking once again, and don't regret making THE SADIST. It was an amazing learning experience, and Tom Savini was a joy to collaborate with. Some folks on the convention circuit seem to think of him as aloof, but on set he has boundless enthusiasm and tremendous energy. I'd love to work with him again one of these days.


It doesn't have any connection, other than the title, to the 1960's Arch Hall film does it?


The film originally had another title, and has nothing to do with Arch Hall's cult classic. Our original title was ridiculous, but we went with it hoping we'd think of something better along the way. In the script, Tom's character was referred to as "the sadistic man" and at one point Tom said, "Why not call it THE SADIST...i.e., 'Tom Savini is THE SADIST'." And that felt right to us. I knew some genre aficionados might remember the Arch Hall movie, but there is more than one film called SAFE, more than one film called CRASH. So THE SADIST is what it was meant to be called all along...
Tom Savini takes exception to Jeremiah Kipp's direction

The Protector (1985)


Jackie Chan is probably the second best known Chinese actor in the US behind Bruce Lee. Never mind that Lee was American, because the majority of Lee’s films came from china he’s considered a Chinese actor by many people.

Jackie Chan is wholly Chinese. He grew up attending the Peking Opera school with Sammo Hung. He moved on to making movies where he made his entry into films with attempts to be the next Bruce Lee, but it wasn’t until he found his comedic style that he went into super stardom. Jackie was so big at the end of the 70’s and early 80’s that there was an effort to cross him over into the American and western markets. He made the barely seen Battle Creek Brawl(aka Big Brawl) before the Cannonball Run movies which did little more than dent American consciousness and make them aware of his existence.

In 1985 two things happened that started to move things, first Chan made the first Police Story film, which hit screens at prestigious festivals across the world and had many people asking who is this Jackie Chan? The other thing that happened was that Chan tried once more to cross over into American market with The Protector.

The Protector is a much reviled cop film starring Jackie as a New York City cop partnered with Danny Aiello who get involved in a kidnapping. Following leads that seem to point to the victim’s father the pair end up going to Hong Kong where all sorts of mayhem ensues.

Written and directed by James Glickenhaus, a king of 1980’s exploitation (The Exterminator, McBain, Shakedown) the film was a battle ground during production. Jackie didn’t like the way the film was being done, and he disliked the script. He had such a miserable time that he had the film recut and new sequences shot for release in Asia. For better or worse Jackie had made a bad choice by hooking up with an American exploitation director who wanted to make a guns and bullets film which went against what Jackie was doing at the time.

For my money The Protector isn’t a bad film. It’s a Glickenhaus exploitation film with Jackie Chan in it. It’s a film, in it’s American incarnation, that is closer to what he’s been doing the last few years. It’s a darker film than Jackie had really done before and it has almost no real martial arts. I saw it when it came out, and I’ve seen it a couple of times since then, and while it’s not a great film, it’s probably better than some of the recent American films he’s done.

I have not (large apteryx) seen the Asian version, which is supposedly better and which is now nigh impossible to see.

I have seen the version that Video Search of Miami put out many years ago which is best described as a Franken-film. This version combines the two versions of the film. It adds in everything together replacing the Chan action for the American.

How is it? Even allowing for the shifting in image quality, more uneven than the American version., the Hong Kong version having a different tone than the American one. It’s possibly better than the American release version but I’m not sure how much.

As it stands now I think the Protector is worth seeing, more so as an example of a failed experiment in marketing a superstar than as a completely working film.